Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Warwick Business School - WBS vs SOAS University of London vs INSEEC Business School vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 342 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Exceptional, practical, and rigorous academic programs
- +Supportive and engaging faculty dedicated to student success
- +Global learning environment and vibrant community
- +Diverse and inclusive community.
- +Global perspectives and academic rigor.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Flexible, self-paced learning
- +Helpful instructors and fast support
- +Relevant and high-quality course material
Nothing to show
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major complaints.
- -Lack of engagement and irrelevant course content frustrate students.
- -Poor administrative support and communication lead to unresolved issues.
- -Lack of adequate support services and advice negatively impacts student well-being and finances.
- -Uncommunicated changes and issues with departmental structure cause significant disruption.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received very strong scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, though still rated favorably. **Value** is also moderately lower compared to other metrics.
This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location**, which received a near-perfect score. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are generally rated well, indicating a solid overall offering with specific strengths and one area for potential improvement.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.
Nothing to show
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
Nearly all 44 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight world-class, rigorous, and practical education, exceptional and supportive faculty, and a globally diverse community.
~76% of 34 reviews are positive, praising global perspectives, diverse community, and supportive professors. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 5.9%) mentions issues with administrative support and communication.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.
Nothing to show
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
I am originally from the USA but decided to pursue my Masters degree in London. My university has a large diverse community of students. I was able to thrive in this environment as I was accepted for being myself. I am Proud to be a SOAS graduate.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
