INSA Rouen Normandie vs Graduate School of Engineering - ESIGELEC vs University Of Rouen vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Excellent training, generalist and varied approach
- +Supportive and competent international teachers with practical courses
- +Diverse and inclusive environment, strong social and associative life
- +Strong teacher-student relationships and valuable learning experiences
- +Welcoming and diverse campus community with opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Engaging academic content and extensive campus activities
- +Supportive learning environment with good teachers and diverse international community.
- +Excellent facilities and well-designed courses catering to professionals.
- +Ideal student city with good amenities and student-friendly scheduling.
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Practical and applied learning methods
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of practical tool training.
- -Unsupportive professors who dismiss constructive criticism.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside solid ratings for professors and overall value. Student life and facilities also receive favorable assessments. The university's internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, though still within a generally positive range.
This institution receives exceptionally strong marks for its Professors and Student Life, both earning a near-perfect 4.8. Value for money also scores very highly at 4.8. The weakest area, though still solid, is Facilities at 4.0. Other areas like Location, Accomodation, and Internationality are well-regarded, with ratings between 4.2 and 4.4.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality standing out as its strongest point. Professors and Value also received commendations. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation, which presents as the weakest rated aspect, followed by Facilities. Student Life and Location are rated well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives highly positive feedback (~100% of reviews are 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.6/5. Recurring praise highlights excellent training, supportive teachers, and a diverse, adaptable environment. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent teachers and a valuable learning experience, with a friendly and diverse campus environment. Some mention issues with building condition and communication.
University reviews are highly positive (~94%), highlighting a great learning environment, good facilities, and an international student community. A small portion (~6%) expressed disappointment with practical training and professor availability.
With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
