Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona vs Harbour.Space University vs HTL International School
Side-by-side comparison from 259 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable professors.
- +Pleasant campus and good university environment.
- +Accessible resources and helpful staff.
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Instruction from experienced industry professionals and global leaders
- +Collaborative and supportive learning environment
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
- +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
- +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support
- +Flexible, specialized course progression
- +Excellent teaching and learning experiences
- +Ample opportunities for growth
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student support from faculty.
- -Substandard facilities, including issues with housing and wifi.
- -Inadequate educational content and inconsistent academic rigor.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Lack of intellectual rigor and outdated educational approach.
- -Disconnect between marketing and actual industry relevance.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Student life stands out as a significant strength, receiving the highest rating. Accommodation presents the weakest area for the institution. Other rated aspects, including facilities, internationality, and value, also garnered favorable scores, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution excels in several key areas, with **Internationality** receiving a perfect score. **Location** and **Student Life** are also highly rated, closely followed by **Professors**. **Facilities** and **Value** are strong, while **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-scoring aspect.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.
This institution excels remarkably in several key areas. Its professors, location, student life, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these domains. Facilities also scored well. The primary area for potential improvement lies in accommodation, which garnered a more moderate rating. Overall, the university offers strong value and a well-rounded experience, with particular highlights in academic and social aspects.
With ~79% positive ratings, students praise supportive professors, great campus environments, and accessible resources. A small percentage of reviews mention poor teaching quality and inadequate faculty feedback.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
Most (~95%) reviews are positive, highlighting practical, project-based learning from industry professionals and a collaborative atmosphere. One review found the program too easy.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.
With an average rating of 4/5, one student review was positive, praising amazing courses, teachers, and opportunities. This feedback highlighted a flexible curriculum with the ability to change majors and specialize later.
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Harbour Space was an overall enriching and positive experience. The majority of the instructors were exceptional, providing invaluable knowledge and insights that significantly enhanced my learning journey. While the program delivered on many fronts, there were some areas where it fell short. Specifically, the promise of investors backing our ideas was not fully realized, and the networking events, although present, lacked the depth and engagement needed to forge meaningful connections. Despite these shortcomings, the education and experience gained were highly valuable.
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
