Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs La Salle U.R.L. vs UIC Barcelona vs Escuela Superior de Cine y Audiovisuales de Cataluña - ESCAC
Side-by-side comparison from 248 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty expertise and professor support
- +Accessible digital resources and student services
- +Pleasant campus environment and connectivity
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Engaging and passionate faculty and visiting lecturers
- +Electric energy and inspiring community
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
- +Flexible online learning format
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +Efficient support and accessible materials
- -Poor teaching quality and negative teacher interactions.
- -Substandard housing conditions and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic support and administrative issues.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective communication and bureaucratic administrative processes.
- -Lack of engaging and up-to-date curriculum.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Across various metrics, the university demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in Student Life (4.23) and Value (4.00). Internationality also scores well at 3.98. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.67, though Facilities (3.90), Professors (3.83), and Location (3.83) also received solid, above-average scores.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths in **professors, location, student life, and internationality**, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Facilities and overall value received moderate ratings of 3.5.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest score. Professors and facilities also earned strong marks. While overall student life and internationality are well-regarded, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still positive, rating. The value proposition is considered perfect.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, useful resources, and a pleasant campus environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) expresses dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty interaction.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%). Reviews highlight engaging teachers and an electric atmosphere. No negative reviews were received.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend ENEB for its flexibility, comprehensive curriculum, and valuable additional courses.
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
I highly recommend the Master’s in Project Management course at ENEB for anyone considering a career in this field. The course is entirely online, making it convenient for those with busy schedules, and it includes valuable additional courses like Business English and specialized modules from Harvard Business School. The quality of the material is veri high and very comprehensive, providing a strong foundation for beginner project managers or those who are just starting to explore this field. It’s also well-suited for small business owners looking to develop strategic planning skills. Overall, a great choice for gaining practical, applicable knowledge in project management!
