Universidad de Oriente - UDO vs Istituto Universitario Salesiano Venezia - IUSVE vs Kenyatta University vs City University of Applied Sciences vs University of Eastern Finland
Side-by-side comparison from 268 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and solid education
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Valuable practical experience and industry exposure
Nothing to show
- +- Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
- +- Well-structured and balanced curriculum
- +- Opportunities for innovation and practical application
- +Strong international connections and global interaction opportunities
- +Diverse and interesting study programs with uncrowded lectures
- +Accessible city center location with industry relevance
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
Nothing to show
- +Career-focused education with practical experience
- +Free valuable international certifications
- +Enriching academic and professional development
- -Lack of administrative support and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and delays.
- -Unfair and punitive grading systems compared to other institutions.
- -Lack of specialization in some programs, leading to career uncertainty.
- -Unclear communication and administrative inefficiencies
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources
- -Lack of student support and engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major concern.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
This institution's strengths lie significantly in its **Professors**, scoring a high 4.16. **Student Life** and **Value** also present positively with ratings of 3.44 and 3.84 respectively. However, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, registering a considerably lower score of 2.61. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong ratings across multiple facets, with Location being its standout strength at 4.55. Professors and Facilities also received high marks, scoring 4.36 and 4.41 respectively. Value and Student Life are similarly well-regarded. The area requiring the most improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest score at 3.95. Internationality also sits in the mid-range.
This university's strengths lie in its exceptional Facilities (4.23) and impressive Value (4.27), with Accomodation (4.17) also scoring highly. Student Life (3.77) and Location (3.97) are rated positively, though less so than the top categories. The weakest area by a noticeable margin is Internationality, scoring 2.93, while Professors received a moderate rating of 3.43.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
Nothing to show
Demonstrating a strong overall performance, this institution receives high marks in numerous areas. Notably, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality are all rated an excellent 4. The university also scores well for value, indicating a positive return on investment. Its weakest area, though still respectable, is location, with a rating of 3.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 31 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, solid education, and personal/professional growth. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 228 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured courses, and supportive campus life. Minimal negative feedback noted issues with grading systems and project stage disorganization.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 and ~0% negative feedback, university reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include strong international connections, convenient city center location, and well-organized, uncrowded lectures.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
Nothing to show
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights an enriching academic and professional experience, strong career-oriented education, and valuable access to free international tech certifications.
The infrastructure is not the best but the education is amazing, as a doctor I’ve learn how to deal and solve any kind of situation and putting the health of the community first even when we live in a country where we don’t have the necessary resources to have the best work environment
Nothing to show
It was amazing, the professors were great. The school compound was extremely big and walking from one lecture hall to another was a big challenge. The long ques during meals at the mess was crazy. There is this thing called missing marks, you could visit exam office a million times without help.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show