Universitatea de Medicina si Farm 'Carol Davila' - UMFCD - UMFCD vs Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University - UCDC vs Spiru Haret University vs University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV vs 'Carol I' National Defence University - UNAp
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Competent and approachable teaching staff
- +Ample practical clinical experience opportunities
- +Easy access to information
- +Practical and useful programs
- +Modern and clean facilities
- +Experienced and supportive teachers
- +Accessible and flexible for working students
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Modern facilities and engaging courses
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Campus ratings reveal a university with a particularly strong location, scoring a high 4.43. Student life also received positive marks at 4.1, and value for money was rated well at 4.25. Accommodation and internationality were moderate, both around 3.6-3.75. The weakest areas, comparatively, are facilities and professors, with scores of 3.12 and 3.27 respectively, indicating room for improvement in these departments.
This institution receives uniformly excellent ratings, with perfect scores across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as all aspects are performing at the highest possible level.
This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviews are predominantly positive (~100%), highlighting valuable and enriching experiences, competent and approachable teaching staff, and good access to information and clinical practice. Some mention slightly outdated teaching systems.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students highlight a great, modern, and clean environment with experienced teachers and useful, practical programs.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university is considered one of the finest medical training institutions in the country. Not sure whether because of the quality itself, or the lack of competition. There are some great, dedicated teachers, who are willing to help students and pass down their knowledge but there are at least just as many uninterested, sloppy teachers. One can find great people and future peers, but also a lot of favoritism and toxic competition.
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show