Universitatea de Medicina si Farm 'Carol Davila' - UMFCD - UMFCD vs University of Bucharest - UB vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Universitatea Bioterra București vs Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB
Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced and supportive faculty
- +Abundant clinical practice opportunities
- +Accessible information and resources
- +Excellent faculty and learning opportunities
- +Positive social experience and friendships
- +Dedicated academic environment
- +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
- +Accessible location and good transportation links
- +Ample facilities available
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
- +Positive overall student experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative support and communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring issue.
- -Lack of essential resources and insufficient academic support negatively impact learning.
- -Professors' lack of care and inconvenient schedules.
- -Administrative and management issues with scholarships.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -lack of resources and support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A look at the university's ratings reveals a strong showing in its location, achieving the highest score. Student life and value also received favorable marks, indicating positive experiences in these aspects. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for improvement. Professor quality, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, reflecting generally satisfactory performance.
Considering the provided metrics, this institution excels in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance. The areas that received lower scores include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most reviews are positive (~100%), highlighting strong academic programs and clinical practice opportunities. Some mention outdated teaching methods or minor organizational issues, but these are not significant concerns.
Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, praising learning opportunities and professional teachers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions uncaring professors and inconvenient scheduling. The average rating is 4.26 out of 5.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university is considered one of the finest medical training institutions in the country. Not sure whether because of the quality itself, or the lack of competition. There are some great, dedicated teachers, who are willing to help students and pass down their knowledge but there are at least just as many uninterested, sloppy teachers. One can find great people and future peers, but also a lot of favoritism and toxic competition.
It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
