Seattle University- Seattle U vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI vs IBBI University

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: STMIK Triguna Dharma (5.00)
Seattle University- Seattle U: wins 0/6 categories
University of Sumatera Utara: wins 0/6 categories
Medan Area University - UMA: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI: wins 0/6 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/6 categories
STMIK Triguna Dharma: wins 6/6 categories
Sa'adu Zungur University - SAZU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Seattle, Washington, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Financial Management
Best programme: Information Systems
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Best programme: Chemistry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
3.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
1.00
Student life
3.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
3.50
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.50
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty interaction
  • +Prime urban location and access to opportunities
  • +Dedicated student support
  • +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
  • +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
  • +Dedicated, quality education from lecturers
  • +Supportive environment valuing students
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Facilities and professors are also strong points, both rated at a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.5.

This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.

This institution garners strong marks in areas like Professors and Value, both receiving a rating of 4. Conversely, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker aspect, with a score of just 1. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all received a consistent rating of 3, suggesting a mid-range performance in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong academics, student support, and the advantageous urban location. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is predominantly positive (~100% favorable). Students highlight dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a supportive environment. Limited negative feedback exists, with one mention of lacking infrastructural amenities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close