ESADE Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - UC3M vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 389 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
ESADE Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IE University: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - UC3M: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
4.40
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA
Madrid, Spain
4.30
Read more reviews
170 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration and Information Systems Management
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.92
4.36
3.89
4.03
4.40
3.92
4.50
Win
Location
3.85
4.55
3.42
3.86
4.70
4.93
Win
4.75
Professors
4.37
4.33
3.92
4.05
4.60
4.64
Win
4.40
Internationality
4.11
4.78
3.77
3.51
4.60
4.93
Win
4.60
Student life
4.00
4.40
3.82
3.81
3.90
4.15
4.50
Win
Value
4.19
4.23
3.72
3.65
3.90
4.29
4.40
Win
Accommodation
3.75
3.89
3.50
3.54
3.00
3.62
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly practical and collaborative learning environment with strong faculty support.
  • +Diverse and engaging cohort fostering community and personal growth.
  • +Excellent career support and opportunities for professional development.
  • +Engaging, knowledgeable professors and practical, career-focused coursework
  • +Vibrant, international campus life and extensive networking opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on business and "do it yourself" skills
  • +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong academic reputation and diverse English-taught programs
  • +Modern facilities and industry connections
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Flexible and practical learning environment
  • +Positive campus and city experience
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Supportive and well-organized academic environment
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including financial misdealings and poor online testing infrastructure.
  • -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking skills.
  • -Negative peer environment and social dynamics.
  • -Academic deception and low standards.
  • -Outdated course material and a misleading "fluid learning" promise.
  • -Lack of traditional college experience due to corporate campus environment.
  • -Excessive focus on theory over practical application.
  • -Limited relevant skills for the job market.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of practical resources.
  • -Poor professor English proficiency
  • -Lack of organization and student support
  • -Disregard for international students
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Lack of extracurricular activities and limited internship/job opportunities.
  • -Poor campus environment and student engagement.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, university ratings show a solid performance with professors and internationality receiving particularly high marks. Student life and value are also rated favorably. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, location, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores in this assessment.

Remarkably high scores across many aspects characterize this university's feedback. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.78) and Location (4.55), indicating significant appeal in global reach and geographical desirability. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating (3.89), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all received solid scores above 4.2.

Academic and student life aspects of the university are well-regarded, with professors and facilities earning high marks. Location and accommodation are areas where improvements could be made, receiving the lowest scores. Internationality and value for money also present positively, indicating a generally favorable student experience with specific opportunities for enhancement.

Academic aspects of the university are generally well-regarded, with **Professors** receiving the highest score at 4.05 and **Facilities** also scoring highly at 4.03. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.54, closely followed by **Internationality** at 3.51. The university also scores moderately well in **Location** and **Student Life**.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This university garners its highest marks for **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated, reflecting strong academic quality. The university's **Value** and **Student Life** also score well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, followed by **Facilities**, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, praising great teachers, practical learning, and career opportunities. The remaining ~11% offer some criticism, including concerns about value for money and administrative issues.

Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, knowledgeable professors, and strong networking opportunities. A small fraction of feedback (around 3%) mentions concerns with academic standards or program specifics.

Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teachers, modern facilities, and practical learning opportunities. A small percentage (around 6%) express dissatisfaction with program structure and lack of practical focus.

With a ~74% positive rating and 4.02 average, students praise academic growth, practical learning, and supportive professors. A small fraction (~4.6%) experienced issues with professor English levels or organization.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4.57/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive, praising diverse classes, educators, and global peer networks. A single negative review (~7%) found it suitable only for those seeking an easy degree with limited extracurriculars.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
62%
54%
26%
34%
60%
71%
60%
4★
29%
31%
55%
41%
40%
21%
20%
3★
0%
12%
13%
20%
0%
0%
20%
2★
2%
2%
6%
2%
0%
7%
0%
1★
7%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Networking

Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career

The review

ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it

Quality, International, Programmes, Languages

I am an international student who comes from Hong Kong. I would start my master's degree (Cultural Management) in September 2022. The school have so many programmes for international students and focuses on the exchange and development of talents of the international students. Moreover, the university provides so many internship programmes for students to choose from each semester. I graduated from The Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2021 with a bachelor's degree in Cultural Management. The universities in Hong Kong are all of a high ranking and have excellent academic performances in both Chinese and English. Moreover, the school provides many extracurricular activities for students.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close