KU Leuven vs Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB vs Vlerick Business School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management vs UBI Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 154 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Engaging discussions through diversity and expert, passionate lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment with ample student interaction and academic development
- +Rich campus atmosphere and promising career prospects
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +Hybrid learning & digitalisation focus
- +Career advancement opportunities
- +Global learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -Discrimination and lack of support from university administration when addressing issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lectures, coupled with excessively difficult exams.
- -Lack of practical elements in the curriculum and insufficient individual student attention.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are commonly criticized.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations negatively impact the student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
Emerging from the data, the university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.38), suggesting a globally connected campus. Solid performance is also evident in **Facilities** (3.98), **Location** (3.96), and **Value** (3.96). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.62) and **Accomodation** (3.51) present areas for potential improvement. Overall, it showcases a good balance with a distinct international strength.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its location and international student experience, both receiving perfect scores. Value for money also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, the facilities are a significant weakness, scoring a zero. Student life and accommodation received moderate ratings, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the green atmosphere, expert lecturers, and diverse environment. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentions issues with lecturer communication and exam difficulty.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights the module as an immersive and valuable experience, boosting business careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
I really like the lush and green atomosphere surrounding the campus on Etterbeek. There is generally always a vivid and positive vibe on the campus. From all the campuses I have been, this one has the most greenery. A small downside however is that some aula's look a bit dated from the inside, yet this isn't much of an issue when it comes to my learning experiences.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
