Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University vs Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Odesa State Economic University vs Daugavpils University - DU

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM (4.70)
Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University: wins 1/7 categories
Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU: wins 0/7 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 6/7 categories
Odesa State Economic University: wins 0/7 categories
Daugavpils University - DU: wins 0/7 categories
Don Honorio Ventura State University: wins 0/7 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: English Language and Philology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Fundamental science education
  • +Quality teaching and materials

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming and supportive international environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Well-structured programs with practical relevance

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and poor communication create frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves top marks for its **location**, rated a perfect 5. Student life and value for money also received favorable scores of 4. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. Facilities, professors, and accommodation are all rated moderately at 3.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring an impressive 4.22. **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Value** also receive positive marks, generally above 4. The weakest area identified is **Internationality**, with a score of 3.67, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. **Professors** also received a respectable but comparatively lower rating at 3.89.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback. One review highlights a strong classical science foundation and excellent teaching materials, though notes a desire for more modern teaching methods and staff. No negative reviews were present.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, a welcoming international environment, and well-structured programs. Limited administrative speed and career support were mentioned.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
67%
0%
56%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
33%
0%
22%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close