IESE Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs St. John's University vs Columbia University vs Baruch College
Side-by-side comparison from 199 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
- +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
- +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Diverse and thoughtful food options
- +Affordable and accessible accommodation
- +Expert professors with real-world experience
- +High-quality education in communications and literature
- +Excellent facilities and supportive student life
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong job placement and career support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** (4.3) and **Location** (4.29). **Professors** (4.28) and **Value** (4.24) also received high scores, indicating student satisfaction with teaching quality and affordability. **Accomodation** (4.04) and **Facilities** (4.06) represent the lowest-rated aspects, though still within a generally positive range.
Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.
Nothing to show
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.
With an average rating of 4.28/5, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors with real-world experience in communications and interpersonal selling, and an appreciation for literature's social impact. Facilities and student life also received praise.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.
Nothing to show
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
