Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC vs Universidad de El Salvador - UES vs Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC vs Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Villa Maria - UNVM (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de El Salvador - UES: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC: wins 0/6 categories
Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK: wins 0/6 categories
Saint Peter's University: wins 0/6 categories
National University of Villa Maria - UNVM: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
San Salvador, El Salvador
4.90
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Information Management
Jersey City, New Jersey, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Political Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
4.19
4.50
4.29
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.08
3.89
5.00
Win
3.57
4.67
Not rated
4.00
Professors
3.83
4.35
4.83
4.88
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.75
4.05
4.83
Win
3.88
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.60
3.86
4.50
4.29
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.75
4.54
4.67
4.13
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.27
4.22
4.50
Win
4.29
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs with industry-experienced professors
  • +Flexible schedules supporting work-study balance
  • +Good job prospects and practical preparation for the professional market
  • +Differentiating and uncommon degree programs
  • +Free and public education
  • +Experienced and committed professors
  • +Quality education and diverse career options
  • +Free tuition and accessible for international students
  • +Good infrastructure and ample learning resources
  • +Highly qualified and inspiring professors
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment with good infrastructure
  • +Valuable networking opportunities and a strong educational foundation
  • +Practical and industry-focused programs
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Free tuition and accessibility
  • +Academic excellence and facilities
Cons
  • -Poor management and communication, particularly concerning administrative tasks.
  • -Outdated curriculum and overly long program duration.
  • -Unattractive facilities and uninspiring campus environment.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical application.
  • -Poor career guidance and limited industry connection.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations cause significant dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent and unengaging teaching methods are a major disappointment.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives its highest marks for location, followed closely by professors and value. Conversely, its internationality rating is notably the lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores, while student life achieved a respectable standing.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Value**, which is its highest-rated aspect. **Accommodations** and **Professors** also receive very strong ratings, indicating excellent student support and facilities. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Location** are the areas receiving the lowest scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement for prospective students. The university demonstrates a generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Location stands out as a perfect score, with professors and internationality also exceptionally rated. Facilities, student life, and accommodation are all strong at 4.5. Value for money is also highly regarded. While all areas are excellent, there isn't a specifically weak category highlighted by these scores.

Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in its faculty expertise, where it achieved an impressive 4.875. Student life, facilities, and accommodation were also highly rated, all scoring 4.28. Internationality and value received solid scores of 3.875 and 4.125 respectively. The location was the lowest-rated aspect, coming in at 3.57.

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities**, which received a perfect score, and its **Location** and **Value**, both rated highly. The university also received a solid 4.33 for its **Professors**. Its **Accommodations** are a weaker area, scoring 3.67, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** received satisfactory marks at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside a strong value proposition. Accommodation and internationality also receive positive assessments. Location, while still rated well, stands out as the comparatively weakest aspect among its strong offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education and job prospects, often with experienced professors. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing outdated curricula, poor management, and unappealing infrastructure.

Most reviews are positive (~97%), praising academic excellence, free education, and professional opportunities. One review expressed dissatisfaction with an outdated curriculum.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise quality education, free tuition, and good facilities. Recurring themes include strong academic programs and experienced professors.

With a 4.67/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive. Students frequently highlight highly qualified, inspiring professors and a welcoming campus environment with excellent resources. No negative feedback was reported.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight great teachers, strong industry connections, and a blend of theory and practice, particularly in computer science and multimedia.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. Positive feedback highlights its aspirational academic excellence and excellent campus facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
35%
86%
78%
50%
0%
100%
4★
36%
57%
14%
11%
50%
0%
0%
3★
21%
5%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
7%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close