Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs National University of Mar del Plata vs San Martin National University - UNSAM

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: San Martin National University - UNSAM (4.90)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 5/6 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/6 categories
San Martin National University - UNSAM: wins 1/6 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Materials Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Category ratings
Facilities
3.30
3.33
5.00
Win
4.00
4.29
Not rated
2.00
Location
4.20
3.67
5.00
Win
4.33
4.43
Not rated
4.00
Professors
3.80
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.71
4.00
4.00
Internationality
2.70
3.33
5.00
Win
3.67
4.86
3.00
3.00
Student life
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.33
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.60
4.67
5.00
4.33
4.71
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.30
2.33
5.00
Win
4.33
3.14
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
  • +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
  • +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
  • +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
  • +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
  • +Extensive virtual and campus network
  • +Pioneer in distance education
  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
  • -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.

Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
67%
33%
67%
86%
0%
0%
4★
25%
33%
33%
33%
14%
100%
100%
3★
25%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close