University of Hawaii at Hilo vs ArtCenter College of Design vs Pearson College London vs Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology - MMUST vs Federal University Oye Ekiti - FUOYE
Side-by-side comparison from 119 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive, qualified faculty and hands-on training
- +Encouragement of academic and social participation
Nothing to show
- +UK qualifications, global presence
- +Great teaching, tutors, and modules
- +Accommodating staff and extracurricular opportunities
- +Conducive learning environment with quality lecturers and focus on skill development.
- +Talent nurturing and career preparation.
- +Good infrastructure and technology integration.
- +Quality education and committed lecturers
- +Conducive and lively learning environment
- +Affordable cost of living
- +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
- +Opportunities for personal growth and success
- +Positive campus community and student integration
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a common concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and inadequate.
- -The university suffers from a lack of resources.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient learning spaces.
- -Sexually harassing lecturers and biased grading systems.
- -Extortionate practices and transportation issues with local communities.
- -Inconsistent or poor administrative and management support is a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes frustration.
Across a comprehensive evaluation, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. The only area falling slightly below this perfect mark is Accommodation, rated at a still strong 4. Overall, the university presents an exceptionally well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in providing a vibrant and globally connected student experience. Its value proposition also stands out with a top rating.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75, and its **Facilities**, rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Accommodations** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.75. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This institution garners excellent reviews for its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a particularly strong rating of 4.46. Location and Student Life are also highly praised, both scoring above 4.3. However, areas like Accomodation and Internationality are rated lower, falling in the mid-to-high 3s. Value for money is also a significant strength, achieving a high score of 4.44.
Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates strong performance in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring over 4.0. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating, with **Facilities** and **Internationality** also falling below 3.6. Student Life and Accommodation present a more moderate standing. Overall, academic and financial aspects are highly regarded, while physical infrastructure and geographic positioning show room for improvement.
Student feedback reveals a university with considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life**, which scored an impressive 4.5. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Location** garnered a respectable 3.5. The most modest scores were for **Accomodation** (3) and **Internationality** (3). **Value** for money was rated positively at 4.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights excellent teaching and hands-on training. Positive feedback emphasizes engaging professors and opportunities for social participation alongside academics.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teaching, supportive staff, and diverse educational perspectives. Some minor feedback notes limited cafeteria food options.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%) with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise nurturing environments, quality learning, and talent development, with a small amount of negative feedback.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, committed lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with facilities and unstable power/internet.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of reviews are positive. Positive feedback highlights helpful lecturers and a conducive study environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When I attended Pearson, it was relatively new and small. This meant that you could build good relationships with staff and tutors and be able to access any help you needed easily. However, despite how new the business school was, any criticism such as the course structure was unwelcome and always argued with. As each year passed the number of new students in each year increased significantly which caused problems with access to both tutors and quiet study spaces as they only had 2 floors and a basement which was shared with Pearson staff. As for the tutors, I received lectures and seminars from some amazing people who were extremely knowledgeable in accounting and made it so much easier to understand. However, being such a new school they hired tutors who they eventually found out - too late might I add - did not fit the role. Nothing was put in place to help rectify the fact that students had received sub-par teaching. Before attending Pearson College, they bragged about their business workshops and connections. Throughout my time at Pearson, I soon discovered that these workshops were few and far between but more importantly, they were often unrelated to my course or fully booked. One highlight is the fact that they added an office space for a start-up business to work and students were able to gain some experience working with them. Moving onto the facilities of the college, there's really not much to talk about. There's limited space at the campus, especially with the growing number of students. There used to be quiet study rooms for students but they were then taken and used as offices for the growing number of staff. Understandably they need office space but it's very hard to study without quiet spaces such as a library. Lastly, the degrees are validated by the University of Kent which although it gives you faith in the programme you are studying, you are faced with extended wait times for results compared to other universities which is especially frustrating in your final year.
Masinde Muliro university of science and technology has a system that defines and delivers expectations for students who have a passion for science and tech. It comprises a staff of positive-minded individuals towards education, who make the institution thrive in both academic and co-curricular activities. The university also has a support program for those who are unable to pay their tuition and fees thus transcending the barriers of illiteracy in the nation.
FUOYE, is the fastest growing university in Nigeria and has helped a lot of graduates achieve their dream. I'm very happy to be part of this innovation. The school is a Great school for aspiring university students
Nothing to show