Haverford College vs Stevens Institute of Technology vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: STMIK Triguna Dharma (5.00)
Haverford College: wins 0/2 categories
Stevens Institute of Technology: wins 0/2 categories
University of Sumatera Utara: wins 0/2 categories
Medan Area University - UMA: wins 0/2 categories
Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI: wins 0/2 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/2 categories
STMIK Triguna Dharma: wins 2/2 categories
Comparing
Bejaia, Algeria
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Mathematics and Economics
Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Information Systems
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
5.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.00
5.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
4.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
5.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academics and supportive community
  • +Meaningful connections with professors and peers
  • +Trust-based self-governance environment
  • +Industry exploration and career building opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and inclusive environment
  • +Relevant and flexible academic programs
  • +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
  • +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of clear course structure and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance frustrate students.
  • -Insufficient resources and support negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded profile with most areas receiving high marks. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and location are particularly strong points, all earning a score of 4. Professors are also highly rated at 4. The weakest area, though still a respectable score, is facilities, rated at 3. Overall, the university offers a solid value proposition.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength, earning perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and overall value. Student life and internationality also receive high marks, at 4.5. The only area not reaching a perfect score is student life and internationality, both rated at 4.5, indicating a slightly less robust, though still very positive, student experience and global engagement.

This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights a strong sense of community and positive academic experiences. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight research opportunities and career development, with no negative feedback received.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
100%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close