United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs La Salle U.R.L. vs BAU Centro Universitario de Artes y Diseño de Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 231 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent faculty expertise and professor support
- +Accessible digital resources and student services
- +Pleasant campus environment and connectivity
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +Industry-expert professors and practical, real-world projects
- +Diverse, multicultural student environment promoting collaboration
- +Comprehensive and complete programs covering various creative skills
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Engaging and passionate faculty and visiting lecturers
- +Electric energy and inspiring community
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Poor teaching quality and negative teacher interactions.
- -Substandard housing conditions and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic support and administrative issues.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective communication and bureaucratic administrative processes.
- -Lack of engaging and up-to-date curriculum.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Across various metrics, the university demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in Student Life (4.23) and Value (4.00). Internationality also scores well at 3.98. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.67, though Facilities (3.90), Professors (3.83), and Location (3.83) also received solid, above-average scores.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
This institution garners exceptional scores across multiple key aspects, including its facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, the accommodation received a significantly lower rating of 1, indicating a considerable area for improvement.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths in **professors, location, student life, and internationality**, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Facilities and overall value received moderate ratings of 3.5.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, useful resources, and a pleasant campus environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) expresses dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty interaction.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the strong creative foundations, practical projects, and industry-expert professors. The multicultural environment and diverse course offerings were also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%). Reviews highlight engaging teachers and an electric atmosphere. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A master of immersive and comprehensive quality focused on people with little or no design knowledge. I had an excellent experience, the only thing that perhaps did not convince me was that the final work is done as a group.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
