United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs University for the Creative Arts - UCA vs Reykjavik University - RU vs Osaka University

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kansai University - KU (5.00)
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 0/4 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/4 categories
University for the Creative Arts - UCA: wins 0/4 categories
Reykjavik University - RU: wins 0/4 categories
Osaka University: wins 1/4 categories
International European University - IEU: wins 0/4 categories
Kansai University - KU: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Digital and Social Media Marketing
Reykjavik, Iceland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
4.11
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.50
3.32
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.75
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.75
3.81
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
4.25
3.37
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.50
4.00
3.86
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.25
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Strong creative and innovative focus
  • +Abundant specialized equipment and resources
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
  • +Affordable and tasty food options

Nothing to show

  • +Vibrant, traditional university environment
  • +Wide range of academic studies and research
  • +Active pursuit of sports
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unprofessionalism from staff.
  • -Frequent technical difficulties and unreliable class scheduling.
  • -Lack of student focus and engagement from the university.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance from instructors is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

This university demonstrates a notable strength in its **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.11. **Professors** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Opportunities for **Student Life** and the **Location** present areas for improvement, both scoring below 3.5. **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.

Nothing to show

Remarkable strengths are evident in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating this as a clear area for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

~74% of reviews are positive, praising creativity, well-taught courses, supportive environment, and abundant resources. A small ~5% of feedback indicates unprofessionalism and poor teaching.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students praise its vibrant campus, diverse academic and research opportunities, and active sports scene.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
50%
24%
0%
50%
0%
100%
4★
0%
50%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
29%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Highly Unprofessional University

I found this to be a highly unprofessional university with very little interest in its students and their education. I undertook an MSc here and found the level of teaching to be extremely poor and not on par with the degree level. During my year at the university, I experienced the following: - The majority of lessons started off with technical difficulties that resulted in lessons losing half an hour.  - Tutors scheduled classes and then did not show up for them. Tutors were significantly late to lectures and then laughed about it. Tutors took annual leave during term time.  - Students were out of control and extremely disruptive, tutors did very little to resolve this issue and on numerous occasions laughed at and therefore encouraging their disruptive behaviour.  - I had lessons that were scheduled to be 2 hours long with 45-minute breaks, reducing the lesson time significantly.  - I attended lessons where the lecture was pre-recorded and played to us on the screen. I had to go to the university to watch a pre-recorded lesson over zoom.  - Lectures were not present at their own classes and took them over zoom, again we had to attend a class to sit and watch a lesson over zoom. In some cases, it took a number of weeks before I saw the tutor physically present in the classroom.  - The blended learning ended halfway through the year, and all students were required to attend all lectures in person with no exception. Which would have been fine had it not been extremely contradictory to the fact that half of the lessons were online classes as it was "more convenient” due to classes having 300+ students in with rooms only able to hold around 100. - I witnessed a significant number of students (I would estimate at around 50) being turned away from a class that they were scheduled to attend as the room held fewer students than were enrolled in the class , and the room was already full. I heard them being told they had to go to another room where the lesson was being streamed on a zoom call. I expressed concerns over marking as I felt that some of the feedback given was not in line with the work that was submitted. I felt that none of my queries were taken seriously and as a result of this, I feel that I have come away with less than I worked for.  I found that this university often made mistakes regarding the publications of awards. My records were updated with a mark that was significantly lower than the one stated on the work and when receiving my final publication I was being given the wrong degree. I felt as though the requirement for an MSc from this university was extremely low and not on par with what I would expect from a post graduate degree. The national average for a MSc Dissertation is between 15,000 and 20,000 words. The maximum word count for my MSc dissertation was 4000 - this is less that I was required to write for my BA. When I raised my concerns to the university I felt that I was met with a very detached and defensive approach and I was made to feel as though I was at fault. After this interaction, I felt cast aside and treated very differently by staff members. I feel that I have spent in excess of £10,000 to learn absolutely nothing. I am very ashamed to say that I attended this university and plan to keep that fact as hidden as possible. If I could go back I would avoid UCA and attend a faculty that takes education seriously. 

Nothing to show

Master’s degree

Excellent academic environment. Friendly lab mates and professors. Food service is inexpensive and delicious. The only thing I dislike was the extreme humid and hot summer days. Other than that, everything is excellent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close