United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universidad de Córdoba - UCO vs Yildiz Technical University vs Kostanay Engineering and Economics University vs ISG International Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Strong academic programs and high quality teaching
- +Positive professor-student relationships and good faculty support
- +Excellent practical experience and career opportunities
- +beautiful campus environment and blend of old and new architecture
- +supportive professors and a stimulating academic atmosphere
- +enriching learning experiences and academic opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with relevant industry skills.
- +Accessible and flexible learning options, including distance education and technology.
- +Supportive faculty and opportunities for student leadership and development.
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Affordable and tasty food options
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Disappointing social activities and overall university experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Student Life** and **Professors**, both receiving a high rating of 4.25. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score well at 4. However, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, rated at 2.5, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. The university generally offers good **Value** and a decent **Location**, both scoring 3.75.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** are also highly regarded, followed closely by **Accomodation** and **Value**. While **Student Life** and **Professors** maintain solid ratings, **Internationality** is the comparatively weaker area, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a particular emphasis on its prime location and impressive facilities.
Presenting a uniform score of zero across all surveyed categories, this university demonstrates a consistent lack of exceptional performance in any given area. From facilities and professors to location and student life, no aspect emerged as a particular strength. Similarly, accommodation, internationality, and overall value also received no positive distinction, indicating a consistent absence of standout features or areas of excellence according to the ratings provided.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With ~73% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.91/5, students highlight a strong academic system, helpful professors, and positive student-professor relationships. Minor administrative speed issues were noted.
With ~92% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise the university's professional environment, good professors, and blend of modern and historic facilities. A small amount of negative feedback mentions unmet expectations, particularly regarding social activities.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate distance learning, practical application, entrepreneurship skills, and challenging tasks from instructors.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Hello! I studied at this university from 2009 to 2012, specializing in the organization of transportation, motion and the exploration of transport. It was a bachelor. I entered the university after graduating from college in this speciality, and I particularly liked that the teachers tried to expand their knowledge and gave tasks to complicate their implementation. Also worth mentioning is that I was given the opportunity to be the first chairman of the student council of the campus and develop its charter.
Nothing to show
In terms of academic fields, OU has its stronghold in natural science majors (Engineering, Robotics, Med, etc.) but the array of departments is still limited compared to US colleges. And social sciences and humanity majors aren't shed as much light on as their natural science counterparts. But I'm currently in the School of Human Sciences, which is quite rare in Japan, so I'd say OU might be a great choice for those interested in Socio, Anthropology, Kyosei studies etc. These are available in English for undergrad level only. And at the undergrad level, we tend not to dive so deep into 1 particular field say, Socio for example. In my experience, the academic journal database at OU is really limited. I can only access JSTOR and ProQuest for free, which imposes lots of restrictions on how updated my sources will be. Though this might be different for other students who utilize different databases on the uni's library website, I didn't receive so much active guidance from my professors regarding these databases. My EMI program is improving its quality by enhancing requirements from teachers. Even in my case when the program wasn't improved, I enjoyed the classes since the professors tried to conduct discussion-based classes and make them really interactive and interesting. It's a way for a Japan-based international student like me to mingle with exchange students of varied backgrounds and Japanese students. I wanna note that I'm from Vietnam and prior to studying at OU my education has been a public one. That is to say, I view my current experience at OU as a definite improvement from my high school education. Some of my classmates who used to go to international schools and study AP or IB remarked that the level of the classes might not have been an upgraded version from their high school experience since they're quite introductory. I think the treatment for international students is good in general (in terms of accommodation assistance, language support, etc.) because of the good operation of International College. But I feel that we're just co-existing with Japanese students without really penetrating into the life and impacting their international outlook. Some classes regarding cross-cultural understanding can be quite awkward and not really helpful because of the poor execution. Regardless, the Japanese can be friendly enough. I got to know my current Japanese close friends and senpais by actively participating in clubs and circles at school. I think cultural exchange might not be problematic, but internationalization initiatives can be more rigorous to make the international student community more salient.
Nothing to show
