United International Business Schools - UIBS vs University of Tokyo - TMU vs ISG International Business School vs Waseda University vs Aoyama Gakuin University - AGU

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 0/2 categories
University of Tokyo - TMU: wins 0/2 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Waseda University: wins 0/2 categories
Aoyama Gakuin University - AGU: wins 0/2 categories
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies - GRIPS: wins 2/2 categories
Tokyo International University - TIU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Civil and Environmental Engineering
Best programme: Public Policy and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.60
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
5.00
4.50
4.80
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.75
5.00
4.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
4.50
4.75
3.80
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.25
4.50
4.25
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.40
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.25
3.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Practical application and real-world relevance
  • +Small class sizes and individualized attention
  • +Strong reputation and graduate success
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Prime Tokyo location and multicultural environment
  • +Conducive learning environment and supportive infrastructure
  • +Strong academic reputation for career success

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse international student body and multicultural environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of clear guidance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This institution garners near-perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location, indicating exceptional strengths in these crucial aspects. Student life and internationality are also highly regarded, receiving scores of 4.5. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, rated at 4. The overall value is excellent, reflecting high satisfaction across multiple dimensions.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **location**, boasting a near-perfect score, and its **facilities**, which are also highly regarded. Student life and professor quality are rated solidly. However, **accommodation** stands out as a notable weakness, receiving a significantly lower score compared to other areas. The university also presents a moderately international environment, with average ratings for value and internationality.

Nothing to show

Consistently outstanding scores mark this university's performance. Across all assessed areas, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, a perfect 5/5 rating signifies excellence. Accommodation and location also received top marks. With a perfect score of 5/5 for value, it appears to offer a comprehensive and highly satisfactory experience without any discernible weak points.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All three reviews are positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight practical learning, individual attention in small classes, and the university's strong reputation.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~80% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise the multicultural experience, great professors, and convenient Tokyo location. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight an enriching, multicultural experience with diverse international engagement.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
75%
100%
50%
60%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
0%
50%
20%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
20%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close