Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Favaloro vs National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Cema - UCEMA (5.00)
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 5/6 categories
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/6 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/6 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Win
3.36
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Location
4.50
Win
4.09
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Professors
4.00
3.91
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
2.82
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.50
Win
3.56
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.50
3.73
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Win
3.27
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money
  • +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
  • +Committed and experienced teaching staff
  • +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Poor management and administrative support
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
  • -Unattractive facilities
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
31%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
31%
33%
0%
0%
100%
100%
3★
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close