Simon Fraser University vs University Canada West - UCW vs Thompson Rivers University - TRU vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Kwantlen Polytechnic University - KPU
Side-by-side comparison from 189 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and challenging academic content
- +Expert faculty and supportive guidance
- +Diverse and valuable program options
- +Practical, career-focused programs with experienced faculty
- +Affordable tuition and internationally recognized certifications
- +Diverse and well-structured learning environment
- +Small class sizes and dedicated professors
- +Valuable, practical courses and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive, inclusive, and beautiful campus environment
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world applications
- +Supportive and approachable instructors with clear explanations
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities for engagement
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- +Flexible pacing and online learning
- +Supportive instructors and helpful feedback
- -Poor course structure and teaching quality.
- -Negative campus atmosphere and organizational problems.
- -Biased and unsubtle course content outside of sciences.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is perceived as lacking or unclear.
- -Outdated facilities and poor parking.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and basic course content for advanced studies.
- -Overpriced housing in the surrounding area.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with particularly strong marks in **Internationality** (4.21) and **Professors** (4.13). **Value** (4.06) also received a commendable rating. Conversely, **Student Life** (3.54) stands out as an area with room for improvement, alongside **Accomodation** (3.69) and **Location** (3.78). Facilities (3.90) are rated moderately well.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.51) and **Internationality** (4.36). **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also score positively, all above 4.1. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.35 compared to the other metrics.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several areas, with Professors, Location, and Value all receiving very high marks. Student Life and Internationality are also rated positively. However, the university's Facilities and Accommodations are its weakest points, showing significantly lower scores compared to other evaluated aspects.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic areas, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality also scoring well at 4.32. Facilities and Location are similarly well-regarded. Student Life and Accommodations, however, present areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.94 and 3.44 respectively. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.0.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
This institution excels in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Location, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Facilities received more moderate scores, suggesting areas for potential improvement. The university also demonstrates strong performance in Professors and Accomodation, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.
With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 70 reviews, approximately 80% are positive, highlighting academic rigor, knowledgeable professors, and valuable programs like co-op. Negative feedback is minimal (~1.4%).
With a high average rating of 4.16/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical programs, experienced professors, and a diverse environment. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 29 reviews, ~93% of feedback is positive, highlighting valuable courses, small class sizes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A small fraction (~7%) of negative comments cite issues with some basic courses and registration processes.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Most students find the university's practical, hands-on learning and supportive professors highly beneficial. Excellent facilities and career-focused courses are frequently praised. There is no reported negative feedback.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100% positive sentiment). Students appreciate the flexibility of self-paced learning and the option to work on schoolwork alongside other commitments.
Nothing to show
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
Each professor that I have had so far was extremely encouraging and was often willing to go the extra step to make sure I understood the course content. The professors I could tell were very tenured and loved their roles. This helped me to foster even more of a passion for sociology, and I would highly recommend students take at least one course because the experience is quite interesting.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
