Redeemer University College vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED vs Malla Reddy University vs South Eastern Kenya University - seku

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Redeemer University College: wins 0/4 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 2/4 categories
Medical University of Lodz - UMED: wins 0/4 categories
Malla Reddy University: wins 0/4 categories
South Eastern Kenya University - seku: wins 2/4 categories
Mauritius Institute of Education - Mie: wins 0/4 categories
Delta University for Science and Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: General Medicine
Hyderabad, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Statistics
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.67
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Location
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
4.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
3.00
2.00
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Value
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
  • +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program

Nothing to show

  • +Conducive and enjoyable learning environment
  • +Quality education
  • +Peaceful and focused setting

Nothing to show

  • +Quality education & appearance
  • +Program strengths (science, technology, marketing, business)
  • +Organization & communication improvements
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instruction and curriculum quality are frequently criticized.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university showcases a strong profile with excellent scores in Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a perfect 5. Value also stands out with a 5-star rating. However, the Location presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 2. Professors and Internationality are rated moderately at 4 and 3 respectively, with Accomodation also falling in the middle at 3.

Nothing to show

This institution shines brightest in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Its **Professors** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a 4. However, **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, scoring a 0. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately at 3, with **Internationality** also receiving a 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students praise the conducive learning environment and enjoyable experience. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights good education quality and appearance, though notes a lack of organization. Negative feedback is minimal.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close