O'Sullivan College of Montreal vs Université de Montréal vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Academy of Aeronautics vs Herzing College

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Polytechnique Montréal (5.00)
O'Sullivan College of Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
Université de Montréal: wins 0/7 categories
École de technologie supérieure - ETS: wins 0/7 categories
Academy of Aeronautics: wins 0/7 categories
Herzing College: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 0/7 categories
Polytechnique Montréal: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Montreal, Canada
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.19
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.47
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
4.11
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
5.00
Win
Professors
3.00
4.24
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.27
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.00
4.11
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.87
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
4.03
1.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Value
3.00
4.03
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.71
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Diverse and challenging course offerings
  • +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
  • +Lack of English support for international students
  • +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
  • +Difficulty finding part-time employment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
  • +Expert and dedicated professors
  • +Vibrant student life
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Limited class options and poor social life.
  • -Outdated and depressing campus facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication leads to unmet student expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners favorable reviews, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.24. Student life and value for money are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.03. Facilities and internationality are similarly strong, with ratings around 4.11 and 4.19 respectively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which sits at 3.71.

A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value were all rated a maximum of 5 out of 5. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in every area evaluated, with no particular category standing out as weaker than others given the uniformly high marks.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

University of Montreal reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97%), highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging coursework, and helpful staff. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentioned limited course options, a dated campus, and social life challenges.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise competent professors and a vibrant student life. No negative reviews were submitted.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
32%
50%
0%
0%
47%
100%
4★
0%
59%
0%
0%
0%
47%
0%
3★
100%
5%
50%
0%
0%
7%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Netwrok management and what i've learned about it

Network management refers to the various activities, tools, and technologies that are used to design, deploy, maintain, and optimize the performance of a network. It involves a wide range of tasks, including monitoring network performance, identifying and troubleshooting problems, configuring and updating network devices, and managing network security. Network management is important for ensuring that a network operates smoothly and efficiently, and for maintaining the availability and reliability of network services. Some common tools and technologies used in network management include network management protocols, network management software, and network management systems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close