O'Sullivan College of Montreal vs Université de Montréal vs John Abbott College vs Academy of Aeronautics vs Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: John Abbott College (5.00)
O'Sullivan College of Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
Université de Montréal: wins 1/7 categories
John Abbott College: wins 3/7 categories
Academy of Aeronautics: wins 0/7 categories
Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology: wins 0/7 categories
LaSalle College Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Montreal, Canada
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering Technologies
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.19
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.47
Location
4.00
4.11
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
Professors
3.00
4.24
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.27
Win
Internationality
3.00
4.11
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.87
Student life
3.00
4.03
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Value
3.00
4.03
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.71
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Diverse and challenging course offerings
  • +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
  • +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
  • +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
  • +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Limited class options and poor social life.
  • -Outdated and depressing campus facilities.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners favorable reviews, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.24. Student life and value for money are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.03. Facilities and internationality are similarly strong, with ratings around 4.11 and 4.19 respectively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which sits at 3.71.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

University of Montreal reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97%), highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging coursework, and helpful staff. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentioned limited course options, a dated campus, and social life challenges.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
32%
100%
0%
0%
0%
47%
4★
0%
59%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
3★
100%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Netwrok management and what i've learned about it

Network management refers to the various activities, tools, and technologies that are used to design, deploy, maintain, and optimize the performance of a network. It involves a wide range of tasks, including monitoring network performance, identifying and troubleshooting problems, configuring and updating network devices, and managing network security. Network management is important for ensuring that a network operates smoothly and efficiently, and for maintaining the availability and reliability of network services. Some common tools and technologies used in network management include network management protocols, network management software, and network management systems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close