Universidad EAFIT vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia vs Universidad de Antioquía - UDEA vs Pascual Bravo university institution - I.U. Pascual Bravo

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB (5.00)
Universidad EAFIT: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 2/7 categories
Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Antioquía - UDEA: wins 1/7 categories
Pascual Bravo university institution - I.U. Pascual Bravo: wins 0/7 categories
University Institution Of Envigado: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University Luis Amigo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Medellin, Colombia
4.80
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.89
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.21
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.88
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.83
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.58
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.36
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.89
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.43
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.42
2.00
Not rated
4.86
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.77
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.09
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Career support and growth opportunities
  • +High-quality education with excellent teachers and facilities
  • +Adaptable methodology and innovative entrepreneurship focus
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Qualified faculty and strong academic programs
  • +Free and accessible quality education
  • +Supportive environment and personal development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to a lack of engagement and poor learning outcomes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives commendable ratings across multiple facets. Its strengths lie particularly in Facilities and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.89. Location also ranks highly at 4.88. While Accommodation and Internationality are also strong, the Value for money is rated lowest among the surveyed areas, though still at a solid 4.42. Professors also received a good score of 4.58.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution garners high marks, particularly excelling in Location and Value, both scoring close to 4.86. Student Life and Professors also receive commendations, averaging over 4.35. Accommodations and Internationality are rated slightly lower but remain solid, above 4. Facilities, at 4.21, are the weakest area.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5, university students overwhelmingly praise the institution. Recurring themes highlight excellent support, career opportunities, and high-quality education. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With ~93% positive feedback, students highlight talented professors, strong academic programs, and supportive resources. Some mention funding limitations affecting practical experiences. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
83%
100%
0%
64%
0%
0%
0%
4★
13%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
0%
7%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good program with things to improve

The University of Antioquia is a university that, despite being in a country as troubled as Colombia, where only in this presidential period education is seen as something necessary for advancement, has been an important bastion to be able to give it some progress. this country. Regardless of what her background has been since the beginning, she lives with the natural contradiction of students from different social classes and even so, from these differences she generates knowledge for all students and for the benefit of the society that surrounds her, being a researcher in the south and Furthermore, being one of the few universities in Latin America, which is at the forefront of postgraduate courses, the only thing that could be said is that this university does fulfill, at least in the vast majority of cases, what Paulo Freire asked so much about liberating education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close