University of British Columbia vs University Canada West - UCW vs University of Ontario Institute of Technology - UOIT vs General Assembly vs ABC Business Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 296 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
- +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment
- +Practical, job-market relevant programs with experienced faculty
- +Diverse environment fostering adaptability and confidence
- +Affordable tuition and flexible scheduling
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Welcoming and friendly university environment
- +Abundant resources and helpful support for students
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
- +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
- +Abundant student resources for academic success
- +Practical, career-focused education with real-world skills.
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment with diverse opportunities.
- +Qualified instructors with industry experience.
- -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
- -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and loss of credits.
- -Facilities are outdated and in poor condition.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a consistent problem.
- -Communication and transparency from staff are lacking.
Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with its **location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating. Other categories like professors, student life, and value fall within a respectable range, indicating a well-rounded but not perfect student experience.
This university garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.38. It also performs well in **Internationality** (4.19) and **Professors** (4.14). Areas with room for improvement include **Student Life** (3.75) and **Accomodation** (3.74), which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed aspects. **Location** (3.85) and **Value** (4.05) fall within a moderate range.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
Nothing to show
A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.
Professors emerge as the strongest area for this university, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, value for money received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other areas, including facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality, received generally moderate ratings, indicating a consistent, albeit not exceptional, performance across these categories.
Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlights practical, fast-paced programs and experienced professors. Students value academic and professional growth, strong analytical skills, and a diverse environment. No negative reviews were provided.
Most (~86%) reviews are positive, highlighting friendly environments and helpful professors. A small percentage (~5%) of feedback mentions issues with transfer credits. The average rating is 4.14/5.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 3.14/5 from 35 reviews, students praise the college's hands-on, technical education and industry-experienced instructors. The learning environment and academic rigor are also highlighted positively.
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
I was a transfer from university of Toronto and when I tell you it genuinely feels like the program coordinators got their creditions from a homeless man down the street. I was in the computer science program at uoft transferred to the same here and the absolute incompetent morons at the transfer credit office basically disregarded over 12-13 credits I righfully earned as general credits instead of the correct course equivalence at the school. For example eesa courses ( environmental science) at uoft transferred as LIBERAL STUDIES CREDIT. Despite the otu equivalent course having the same syllabus as the eesa course the Program heads clearly made it a competition to display their blatant stupidity by disregarding this and continuing to assess these credits falsely. This school will trap you doing bulls*it courses and HOW ARE YOU CALLED A TECH UNIVERSITY WHEN YOU PROVIDE 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSES OVER THE SUMMER AND YOUR COURSES ARE ALWAYS FULL
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
