Fisher College of Business vs Neapolis University Pafos vs University of Manitoba vs Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia vs Kathmandu University

Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Manitoba (4.10)
Fisher College of Business: wins 0/7 categories
Neapolis University Pafos: wins 3/7 categories
University of Manitoba: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia: wins 0/7 categories
Kathmandu University: wins 2/7 categories
Edutus University: wins 0/7 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Winnipeg, Canada
4.10
Top
Read more reviews
103 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Dhulikhel, Nepal
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Finance
Budapest, Hungary
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
4.06
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.95
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.67
4.20
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.89
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
2.00
4.13
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.93
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
  • +Diverse international student community
  • +Strong academic programs and quality education
  • +Dedicated and passionate professors
  • +Rewarding and challenging courses

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent, updated curriculum and faculty.
  • +Supportive learning environment and career support.
  • +Strong infrastructure and technology access.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
  • -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
  • -Some professors lack passion and require students to self-teach.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and poor organization lead to confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.

Internationality stands out as the strongest aspect with a rating of 4.20, followed closely by Value at 4.13. Facilities also received a solid score of 4.06. Conversely, Student Life, rated at 3.89, appears to be the lowest-scoring area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a good performance across various metrics.

Nothing to show

Academic strengths shine through, with professors receiving an excellent 4.5 rating and value for money also scoring highly at 4.5. Facilities and student life are solid at 3.5, while location and internationality are rated a respectable 3. The primary area for improvement lies with accommodation, which received the lowest score of 2.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.

With a 4.11 average rating from 103 reviews, ~81% are positive. Students highlight good programs and resources. A small fraction of feedback (~1%) mentions a need for more passionate professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise excellent faculty, updated syllabi, and engaging learning environments, despite one mention of campus distance from the city. Management is noted as an area for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
51%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Worst Diploma Thesis Experience

I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close