Cyprus International Institute of Management vs The American College of Cyprus vs Cyprus International University vs Cyprus Institute of Marketing vs Ctl Eurocollege
Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Vibrant community and engaging living environment
- +Frequent and enjoyable campus events and activities
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Study-friendly environment and resources
- +Comprehensive program offerings
- +Engaging instructors & effective teaching methods
- +Relevant curriculum & practical skills development
- +Supportive learning environment & strong community feel
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
- -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Non-recognized degrees and credentials.
- -Perceived waste of time and money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
Nothing to show
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with particular excellence in Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and Professors are also well-regarded at 4. Value for money is rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.5, though still meeting a reasonable standard.
Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Across all surveyed categories, this university receives consistently low ratings. Its performance is uniformly weak, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak relative to others. The institution scores a single point in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, indicating a pervasive need for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a vibrant community with frequent events and seasonal celebrations, making it an engaging and recommendable living environment.
Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.
With a single review and an average rating of 1/5, feedback is overwhelmingly negative (~100%). The primary concern is the perceived lack of university recognition and the resulting unmarketable degree, leading to regret over the investment of time and money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.
All I can say is it was my biggest regret to get Bachelors from cyprus institute of marketing.. I paid too much and i gt a degree which i cannot use anywhere. Nobody recognizes your university neither certificate.. My admissions to MBA were rejected because of your degree even in Europe because your it wasnt worth or got that credentials from cyprus edu board. Seriously i want to put a case on this uni and sue it. You waisted my time money and broke my dreams to study abroad instead i did the the projects in very hardworking manner. Even it cant be used in United Arab Emirates for visa requirements. If i would be there i will definently drag you guys to court for doing this to me. Yes i am student of CIMA and it ruined my life to be one. This is my feedback for you guys. IF ANYTHING U CAN DO IS TO CORRECT YOUR MISTAKE IS GIVE ME RECOGNIZED DEGREE. I would like to know your thoughts on it. Show quoted text
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
