Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Petre Andrei University of Iași vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive faculty
- +Valuable practical experiences and learning opportunities
- +Affordable living costs and good facilities
Nothing to show
- +Convenient location and accessible teachers
- +Support for balancing studies with work and other activities
- +Strong technical training and faculty advantages
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors and faculty
- +Positive and pleasant study experience
- +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Interactive and interesting courses
- -Outdated teaching methods and poor future preparation.
- -Arrogant academic staff and poor student treatment.
Nothing to show
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from faculty and administration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources that hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging and effective teaching methods.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause frustration for students.
- -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and not aligned with industry needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
This university garners particularly strong ratings in **Student Life** and **Location**, both exceeding 4.2. **Value** and **Accomodation** also score highly, around 4.0. In contrast, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.58, while **Facilities** also falls slightly below other metrics at 3.88. Professors are generally well-regarded, nearing a 4.0 average.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves a perfect score for its **location**, making it a significant draw. However, its **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** all receive moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. The **professors** are a stronger point, earning a solid 4.
This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution excels, securing perfect scores in **Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value**. Accommodations and Facilities also received strong marks at 4 out of 5. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high-quality experience, with its strongest aspects lying in its academic staff, vibrant campus, and affordability. Its weakest areas, though still highly rated, are its physical infrastructure and housing options.
This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.
With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 19 reviews, approximately 74% are positive, highlighting good facilities and involved teachers. A small portion (~5.3%) experienced disappointment with teaching methods and arrogant staff.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. Students are delighted by accessible courses and approachable teachers, recommending the university for flexible learning. No negative feedback was received.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.
Nothing to show
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback highlights great professors in the Faculty of Computer Science who support students. There is no negative feedback to report.
Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show