RMIT University vs Swinburne University of Technology vs Melbourne Business School vs Australian Catholic University vs Box Hill Institute
Side-by-side comparison from 141 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skills emphasis
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for electives, exchange programs, and work-integrated learning
- +Life-changing educational experience and career readiness
- +Supportive community and valuable peer connections
- +Excellent study environment and resources
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment, supportive staff and professors
- +Strong emphasis on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Blend of modern teaching with traditional values
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Central and accessible campus location
- +Friendly and welcoming staff and students
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Teachers are unhelpful and actively work against students' success.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Inflexible course structures and unsupportive teaching staff are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are frustrating.
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. Its **Facilities** and **Value** also receive very positive marks. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in global reach and its physical setting.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its only slight deviation from a perfect score is in location, which still garners a very respectable rating. The university's strengths are clearly in its comprehensive offerings and student experience.
Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, student life emerges as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting potential for improvement in campus engagement and activities. Other aspects like facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all fall within a generally positive range, with value and internationality scoring particularly well.
Nothing to show
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving top marks for its **location**, **accommodation**, and **value**. International students will find it particularly appealing, with a perfect score for **internationality**. While the **facilities** and **professors** are also rated highly, **student life** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, good teaching quality, and diverse electives. A small percentage of feedback expressed concerns about faculty.
With an average rating of 5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight life-changing experiences, strong support systems, quality education, and career readiness. They also appreciate university events, study spaces, and library resources.
With ~86% positive feedback, students praise inclusivity, supportive staff, and relevant coursework, highlighting strong workforce connections. Some note a less prominent student culture but are grateful for opportunities.
Nothing to show
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the central, accessible campus and friendly staff and fellow students. There is no negative feedback to report.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
They are thugs. Don't ever go to them. The teachers are part of the cartel who do not help students to let them fail and earn millions of dollars. Infrastructure is the best but the teachers are the worst.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Bachelor of Speech Pathology at ACU and loving it! The program is structured so you have optimal practical learning that correlates with the theory. All of the content is relevant to Speech Pathology practice. There are also so many job opportunities available once you graduate.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
