Université de Nantes vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs Excelia Business School vs LISAA School of Design vs Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV
Side-by-side comparison from 100 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse course options and competent instructors
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
- +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
- +Supportive environment & welcoming community
- +Prestigious European university for design
- +Focus on practical application over theory
- +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
- +International exposure and multicultural environment.
- +High-quality teaching and good course content.
Nothing to show
- +Modern facilities and accessibility
- +Strong student associations, especially technical ones
- +Well-regarded programmes
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
- -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.
Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.
Nothing to show
Academic strengths and facilities are notable highlights, with professors receiving a perfect score and facilities earning a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas where improvements could be considered. Overall, the institution offers good value and accommodation options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.
With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its modern and accessible environment, though some note challenges joining student associations. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show