Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Técnica de Manabí - UTM vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Florida International University - FIU vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES (4.70)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Técnica de Manabí - UTM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 6/7 categories
Florida International University - FIU: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/7 categories
Bahrain Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Miami, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
61 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Interior Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
3.00
4.80
Win
4.51
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Location
4.32
4.00
5.00
Win
4.39
4.50
Not rated
2.00
Professors
4.27
4.00
4.60
Win
4.44
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.14
3.00
4.40
4.54
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.36
3.00
4.60
Win
4.24
4.50
Not rated
2.00
Value
4.10
3.00
4.60
Win
4.52
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Accommodation
3.88
4.00
4.40
Win
4.20
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Vibrant cultural diversity and friendly people
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Convenient and flexible learning options
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and practical teaching
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Strong career focus and industry connections
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear expectations frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized and outdated program content
  • -Poor administrative and management practices
  • -Inadequate facilities and resources
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance across multiple areas, with **Internationality** standing out at 4.54, closely followed by **Value** (4.52) and **Facilities** (4.51). **Professors** also received a high rating at 4.44. The **weakest area** is **Student Life**, scoring 4.24, just below **Accomodation** at 4.2. **Location** remains a solid performer at 4.39.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a mixed performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a respectable rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** emerge as significant weaknesses, scoring the lowest. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** fall in the lower tier, suggesting room for improvement in these domains as well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 61 reviews, students praise diversity and friendly faculty/peers. The university's vibrant culture and convenient online programs are also frequently highlighted.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With only one review available, it is overwhelmingly negative (100%). The single review expresses disappointment with the disorganization of the Communications and Networks Engineering degree program.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
67%
49%
50%
0%
0%
4★
42%
0%
33%
48%
50%
0%
0%
3★
8%
100%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close