BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs University of Eastern Finland vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar Pakistan

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eastern Finland (4.70)
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/5 categories
University of Bergen: wins 0/5 categories
University of Eastern Finland: wins 1/5 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/5 categories
Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar Pakistan: wins 0/5 categories
Institute of Management and Technology - IMT : wins 1/5 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Analytical Chemistry
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
4.33
4.71
Win
3.25
4.17
3.50
Location
4.50
4.33
4.00
4.14
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.50
3.86
4.33
4.43
3.75
4.33
4.50
Internationality
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.43
3.50
3.83
4.50
Win
Student life
4.00
4.43
5.00
Win
4.29
3.50
4.17
3.50
Value
3.00
4.14
4.00
4.14
3.50
4.50
4.50
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
4.33
4.71
Win
3.50
4.33
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
  • +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
  • +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Exceptional and inspiring faculty
  • +Strong career support and job placement
  • +High-quality facilities and management
  • +Strong focus on engineering and technology
  • +Up-to-date teaching and challenging practicals
  • +Qualified and patient lecturers
  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of clear communication.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This university demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being Professors (3.75) and a tie across Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all at 3.5. Conversely, Facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 3.25, with Location also scoring a moderate 3. While the academic core is well-regarded, improvements in physical resources could further enhance the overall student experience.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and strong performances in **Value** (4.5) and **Accomodation** and **Professors** (both 4.33). Facilities and Student Life also score well at 4.17. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.83.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

University reviews show overwhelmingly positive sentiment, with ~75% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise exceptional faculty and strong career support. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students commend the institution's technology focus, excellent engineering and technology performance, updated teaching, and challenging practicals.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
43%
67%
29%
25%
33%
50%
4★
100%
43%
33%
57%
50%
33%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
14%
25%
33%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close