BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava - STU vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Godfrey Okoye University - GOUNI
Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Comprehensive preparation for life's challenges
- +Ample opportunities for study and practical work experience
- +Widely accepted European degree providing sufficient living standards
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +High academic standards & quality teaching
- +Supportive & accessible staff
- +Conductive learning environment & discipline
Nothing to show
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Many students are unhappy with the outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -There are recurring complaints about poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Lack of responsiveness and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its **location**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and overall **value**. These aspects are clearly areas of significant investment and positive student experience. Conversely, the **professors** received a comparatively lower rating of 3, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement when contrasted with its other highly-rated features. The **facilities** also scored well at 4.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution garners its highest marks for Location, achieving an impressive 4.67. Student Life and Internationality also stand out with strong scores of 4.25. Conversely, Accommodation represents the area with the lowest rating at 3.5, indicating room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well at 3.75, while Value is also a solid performer at 4.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback is entirely positive, recommending the university for its comprehensive preparation for life's challenges and broad educational opportunities.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25/5 average rating. Students praise the academic structure, lecturer support, and conducive learning environment. Limited feedback suggests minor areas for improvement like internet access.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I began my programme at Godfrey Okoye university with a discouraged mind because it was not a first choice university. This was because of a number of reasons, one of which was the fact that it wasn't a renowned university and I wasn't aware of the experience of the lectures. My experience at Godfrey was bittersweet because the lectures were totally engaging and demanding. Being a Private University, the issue of strike was totally ruled out. The lectures were organized but some of the lecturers were not friendly. The student life was amazing but at the initial stage; we had the problem of accommodation because there weren't enough rooms for the student. We had so many activities and groups to join which include; literary society, order society e.t.c religious groups. However, we had the problem of management of the hostels and accommodation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
