University of the People - UoPeople vs California Institute of Technology - Caltech vs ArtCenter College of Design vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 3,256 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible online format
- +Affordability
- +International community
- +Practical, experiential learning for career readiness.
- +Strong academic support and extensive opportunities.
- +Close-knit, supportive community and innovation focus.
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Data security breaches and lack of community support.
- -Hidden costs through mandatory exam fees exceeding expectations.
- -Difficulties navigating the learning platform.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Unengaging or poorly structured curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its professors and internationality, both receiving near-perfect scores. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities and location fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside the standout positive aspects.
With a generally positive performance, the university excels in its **Facilities** (4.37) and **Professors** (4.42), indicating a strong academic and physical environment. **Value** (4.22) also receives a commendable rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.89) and **Internationality** (3.81) represent areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed aspects.
Nothing to show
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
With 98.7% positive reviews, students praise the affordability, flexibility, and diverse global community. A tiny fraction of feedback mentions navigation issues and a data breach.
Most students report highly positive experiences, citing practical and innovative learning, strong academic support, and a supportive community. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
My experience at UoPeople has been amazing! I love the flexibility, affordability, and opportunity to learn with students from around the world. UoPeople is helping me turn my educational goals into reality
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
