Eastern Mediterranean University - DAU vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs Cyprus International University vs UCLan Cyprus vs Mediterranean Institute of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 145 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: UCLan Cyprus (4.70)
Eastern Mediterranean University - DAU: wins 4/7 categories
University of Nicosia - UNIC: wins 0/7 categories
Cyprus International University: wins 3/7 categories
UCLan Cyprus: wins 0/7 categories
Mediterranean Institute of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Ctl Eurocollege: wins 0/7 categories
Cyprus West University - CWU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Larnaka, Cyprus
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: BA in International Hospitality Management (awarded by British University Vietnam)
Limassol, Cyprus
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.24
3.92
4.25
Win
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.03
4.13
4.13
Win
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.23
4.24
4.30
Win
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.48
Win
4.21
4.40
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.25
Win
3.80
4.03
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.26
Win
4.14
4.10
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.27
Win
4.13
3.86
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse international community and peer learning
  • +Well-structured, comprehensive academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Strong career preparation and internship opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
  • +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
  • +Well-organized courses with ample resources
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Study-friendly environment and resources
  • +Comprehensive program offerings
  • +Practical, real-world learning and industry focus
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers
  • +High-quality, relevant curriculum and modern technologies

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of practical application in curriculum.
  • -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
  • -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
  • -Platform not consistently updated.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes negatively impact the learning experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves excellent ratings in several key areas, particularly in **Internationality** which stands out at 4.48. **Accomodation** and **Value** also score highly, both above 4.25. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are similarly well-regarded. The **Location** emerges as the weakest area, though still rated positively at 4.03, indicating a generally strong overall perception.

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.

Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

Performance varies across this university's assessed areas. Professors and Value are its strongest points, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality present the weakest aspects, with considerably lower scores. Facilities fall in the middle of these extremes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%) with an average rating of 4.07/5. Students praise the diverse community, academic programs, and experienced faculty, noting strong career preparation and extensive resources. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.

Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.

Students rate their university experience highly, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Recurring themes praise practical learning, approachable lecturers, and relevant course content. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
15%
7%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
4★
78%
90%
63%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

UNIC in all ramification

UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.

cyprus international university as a post-graduate

While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.

Strong practical focus

At University of Central Lancashire, Hospitality and Tourism Management feels less like studying an industry and more like understanding how experiences are created. It’s not just about hotels or travel—it’s about people, culture, and the systems behind global tourism. The program blends management, customer experience, and tourism strategy in a practical and approachable way. It encourages communication, adaptability, and real-world thinking rather than just textbook learning. The atmosphere feels international, which fits naturally with the global nature of the field itself. It’s not the most intense or technical program, and sometimes you may want more industry exposure. But if you engage with it, you leave with something valuable—the ability to understand both the business and human side of hospitality and tourism.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close