Eastern Mediterranean University - DAU vs Global Business University - Europe - GBU vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs Cyprus International University vs UCLan Cyprus
Side-by-side comparison from 152 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international community and peer learning
- +Well-structured, comprehensive academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Strong career preparation and internship opportunities
- +Helpful and supportive staff
- +Flexible and accessible education
- +Relevant and practical learning
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
- +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
- +Well-organized courses with ample resources
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Study-friendly environment and resources
- +Comprehensive program offerings
- +Practical, real-world learning and industry focus
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +High-quality, relevant curriculum and modern technologies
- +International community and faculty support
- +Strong industry connections
- +State-of-the-art technology and facilities
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
- -Administrative & management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Lack of practical application in curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
- -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
- -Platform not consistently updated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Overcrowding and large class sizes negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a significant concern.
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
This institution achieves excellent ratings in several key areas, particularly in **Internationality** which stands out at 4.48. **Accomodation** and **Value** also score highly, both above 4.25. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are similarly well-regarded. The **Location** emerges as the weakest area, though still rated positively at 4.03, indicating a generally strong overall perception.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving strong scores around 4.67. Professors also earned a high mark of 4.67. The university's Facilities and Location received solid ratings of 4, while Accomodation scored slightly higher at 4.33. The weakest area, relative to its highest scores, appears to be Facilities and Location.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.
Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Performance varies across this university's assessed areas. Professors and Value are its strongest points, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality present the weakest aspects, with considerably lower scores. Facilities fall in the middle of these extremes.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The only area not achieving a top rating is student life, which is rated a strong 4. This suggests a highly desirable academic environment with outstanding resources and opportunities.
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%) with an average rating of 4.07/5. Students praise the diverse community, academic programs, and experienced faculty, noting strong career preparation and extensive resources. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.67 average rating from three reviews, students highly recommend the university, citing helpful staff and flexible programs. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.
Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.
Students rate their university experience highly, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Recurring themes praise practical learning, approachable lecturers, and relevant course content. No negative feedback was provided.
With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback highlights an international community and supportive faculty.
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
I previously studied for an undergraduate degree with The Cyprus Institute of Marketing (BVI) through a local center in Uganda – Center for International Studies. I then decided to continue my studies in 2017 with a graduate degree and opted to do the MSc in Fraud Auditing
UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.
While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.
At University of Central Lancashire, Hospitality and Tourism Management feels less like studying an industry and more like understanding how experiences are created. It’s not just about hotels or travel—it’s about people, culture, and the systems behind global tourism. The program blends management, customer experience, and tourism strategy in a practical and approachable way. It encourages communication, adaptability, and real-world thinking rather than just textbook learning. The atmosphere feels international, which fits naturally with the global nature of the field itself. It’s not the most intense or technical program, and sometimes you may want more industry exposure. But if you engage with it, you leave with something valuable—the ability to understand both the business and human side of hospitality and tourism.
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
