GBSB Global Business School vs IE University vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad de Almería
Side-by-side comparison from 300 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Engaging professors with deep knowledge and professional backgrounds
- +International and interdisciplinary environment fostering networking and diverse perspectives
- +Practical learning and strong support for student success
- +Welcoming people and active campus life
- +Comprehensive and complementary programmes
- +Practical learning opportunities and real-world application
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Friendly and well-prepared staff and faculty.
- +Engaging and relevant course content.
- +Good campus facilities and location.
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Academic standards and course quality are frequently criticized.
- -Marketing promises, particularly regarding technology and flexibility, do not align with reality.
- -The campus environment lacks traditional college experience and diversity.
- -Poor professor English proficiency and lack of care for international students.
- -Disorganization and a lack of a cohesive program structure.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources is a major concern.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
- -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This institution garners significant praise for its exceptional internationality, achieving a rating of 4.76. Location is also a strong suit, rated at 4.55. Student life and professors are well-regarded, both scoring 4.36, closely followed by facilities at 4.35. Value for money is rated at 4.24. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.77.
This university garners strong marks in academics and overall experience, with Professors receiving the highest rating at approximately 3.9 and Facilities closely following at 3.83. Student Life and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both rated at 3.44, indicating these aspects may not meet the same high standards as other surveyed categories.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This university garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. Value also stands out with a high rating. Location is the area receiving the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, with Professors also performing solidly.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
Around 74% of reviews highlight positive learning experiences, strong business and networking skills, and an international environment. A small percentage (3.1%) of reviews express concerns about academic deception and the educational experience.
With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight positive interactions and campus life. A small percentage (~6%) express disappointment, citing low academic rigor and English proficiency concerns.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With a 4.17 average rating from 12 reviews, ~83% are positive. Students praise friendly staff, well-prepared teachers, and enjoyable classes. A few noted transport challenges during peak hours and improvable facilities.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
