GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 366 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Supportive, intense, and up-to-date academic programs with practical application
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth beyond academics, including leadership and diverse experiences
- +Strong career support, excellent placements, and networking opportunities
- +Experienced professors and engaging practical learning
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Modern campus and strong career preparation
- +Approachable, supportive professors and engaging teaching
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
- +Flexible hybrid learning options and personal development
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Practical learning with real case studies and industry professionals
- +Comprehensive sports management curriculum covering finance, marketing, and operations
- +Experiential learning through impactful trips
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive faculty and international environment
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor handling of financial matters and logistical challenges.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Negative social environment and perceived unfair financial practices.
- -Marketing promises regarding innovation and flexibility are not met.
- -Academic standards and program content are perceived as low quality.
- -The campus environment is corporate and lacks a traditional college experience.
- -Low English proficiency of professors
- -Poor organization and lack of care for international students
- -Disappointing program content and teaching quality
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Difficulty getting refunds.
- -Unethical business practices.
- -Lack of integrity.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
Performance across key university metrics shows varied strengths. Professors receive the highest marks, followed closely by value and internationality. Student life and location also score well. The university's weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, though both still achieve respectable scores.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.78) and **Location** (4.55). Student life and facilities also receive high marks. The area requiring the most attention is **Accomodation**, which has the lowest rating (3.89). Other categories like Professors and Value are also rated favorably.
This institution is rated highly for its professors, achieving a score of 4.1. Facilities also score well at 4.0. Areas receiving lower scores include accommodation and internationality, both around 3.5. The university presents a generally positive profile, with particular strengths in academic and campus resources, while areas like student housing and global diversity could see further development.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution garners impressive scores in its physical resources and student experience, with Facilities rated a remarkable 4.5 and Student Life a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement are evident in the teaching staff and international appeal, as Professors and Internationality received marks of 3.33 and 3.67 respectively. Location also falls within this moderate range at 3.
Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, a supportive environment, and practical learning opportunities. The remaining ~8% of feedback mentions concerns about value and IT infrastructure.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising professors' experience, international environment, practical coursework, and networking opportunities. The remaining feedback highlights academic deception, low standards, and a corporate campus feel.
~76% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, engaging content, and practical learning. A small percentage of feedback noted low English proficiency from some professors and organizational issues.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews suggest a mixed experience. Approximately 33.3% of feedback is negative, highlighting concerns about financial practices and course cancellations. Positive comments praise learning from industry professionals and practical, hands-on experience.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing better than learn from the best professionals in the Sports Industry with real case studies and 2 fantastic trips in London and New York. I learned every aspect of the Sports Management, from finance to marketing to Stadium Management. Learning by doing is the key to success.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
