Paris-Dauphine University vs EDHEC Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs IDRAC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 128 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and focused learning environment
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching quality
- +Excellent career opportunities and international exposure
- +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
- +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
- +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
- +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
- +Great facilities and well-structured classes
- +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
- +High-quality education with specialized pathways and practical application
- +Supportive community and vibrant campus life with numerous activities
- +Strong industry connections and opportunities for real-world experience
- +Strong academic support and faculty availability
- +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
- +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are also disliked.
- -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
- -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
- -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
- -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant course content.
- -Significant organizational and administrative problems.
- -High cost with little perceived value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive assessment of the institution. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scored commendably, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.
The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.
This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.
Overall, this institution receives a balanced set of ratings. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11), indicating positive student experiences in these regards. **Accomodation**, however, presents the weakest point at 3.37. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Internationality fall within a mid-to-high range, suggesting generally satisfactory performance across these aspects.
Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight rewarding academic journeys, intellectually engaging environments, and supportive faculty. Career opportunities and strong program reputation are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.
Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. Just ~7.4% of feedback is negative, citing unprepared professors and organizational issues.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
Paris Dauphine is indeed recognized worldwide for its teaching in organizational and market sciences. This is why one can specialize in many interesting fields such as Finance or Marketing. It is also the case for the numerous research works it has been able to carry out. So, I love my University and I would recommend it very strongly.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
