Birkbeck University of London vs Cass Business School vs Buckingham Business School vs INSEEC Business School vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 115 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and caring staff communication
- +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse and motivated student community
- +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
- +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
- +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
- +Small class sizes and individual attention.
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic resources and LSE curriculum
- +Effective administration and flexible learning environment
- +Cooperative professors and engaging teaching methods
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Inconsistent and poor administrative and management support.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective teaching and outdated curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of communication and transparency causes frustration.
Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.
This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for **Internationality**. Other strong points include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a respectable 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker aspects, each scoring 3. **Value** also sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution receives very positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5 or higher. **Location** and **Internationality** also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating among the surveyed areas, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are consistently strong.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With one review and an average of 4/5 stars, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. This single review highlights small class sizes and excellent student-teacher ratios, enabling individual support. There is no negative feedback to report.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University of London reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.63. Students praise job-ready skills, cooperative professors, excellent VLE, and comprehensive programs with LSE curriculum. Some noted challenges with online learning and lack of face-to-face interaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
In my opinion choosing UOL for my undergrad was the best decision of my life. It not only taught be job ready skills it taught me how to approach a difficult task and win. The VLE portal was just awesome. The VLE or virtual learning environment provided me with necessary course and study material. Which was very helpful for a better understanding of Law.
