Université de Lorraine vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Lahore Garrison University vs Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: RUBIKA (4.40)
Université de Lorraine: wins 0/6 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/6 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/6 categories
Lahore Garrison University: wins 1/6 categories
Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
RUBIKA: wins 1/6 categories
Østfold University College: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Best programme: Electrical and Control Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.50
4.71
Win
3.50
Not rated
4.47
4.00
Location
4.00
4.50
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.13
4.00
Professors
4.33
4.50
4.43
4.50
Not rated
4.27
3.00
Internationality
3.44
4.00
4.43
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.87
4.00
Student life
4.00
4.00
4.29
4.00
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Value
3.44
3.00
4.14
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
3.00
4.71
3.00
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
  • +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Excellent IT and Computer Science programs
  • +Strong career outcomes and job placement
  • +Positive campus environment with good facilities and active societies

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
  • +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
  • +Balanced theory and lab work focus
  • +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

An examination of the university's ratings reveals a strong emphasis on its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received high marks at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include **accommodation**, which received a score of 3, representing the lowest rating. Other aspects such as student life, internationality, and value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally well-rounded institution.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise well-educated teachers, good courses, and campus facilities, particularly for IT programs. Event organizations and student societies are also highlighted positively.

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.

Rating distribution
5★
11%
0%
29%
0%
0%
47%
0%
4★
89%
100%
57%
100%
0%
47%
100%
3★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
7%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close