ParisTech – Paris Institute of Technology vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Universidade Paranaense - Unipar vs University of the Philippines Manila - UPM vs Medical University Of Graz

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
ParisTech – Paris Institute of Technology: wins 0/1 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 0/1 categories
Universidade Paranaense - Unipar: wins 0/1 categories
University of the Philippines Manila - UPM: wins 1/1 categories
Medical University Of Graz: wins 0/1 categories
South Valley University - SVU: wins 0/1 categories
Faculty of Human Kinetics ULisboa - FMH: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Primary Education
Best programme: Behavioral and Social Sciences
Best programme: Physical Activity and Sport Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.67
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
5.00
2.33
5.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
2.33
5.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
2.33
5.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.33
2.00
5.00
Not rated
1.00
5.00
Value
Not rated
5.00
1.67
5.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
5.00
1.33
5.00
Not rated
1.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Highly qualified and able instructors
  • +Excellent course offerings
  • +Positive overall college experience
  • +Health and science focus
  • +Practical communication skills

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Amazing atmosphere and practical student experience due to location
  • +Attentive and helpful professors
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Focus on profit over student development
  • -Poor job market preparedness
  • -Ineffective administration and management
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and practical experience.
  • -Course content is sometimes irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

When evaluating this university, its strongest aspects lie in its location and internationality, both receiving a rating of 2.33. Professors also scored comparably at 2.33. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 1.33. Facilities and student life were rated at 2, while value received a 1.67.

Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, achieving perfect scores in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value are all rated exceptionally high. While facilities and internationality received strong scores of 4, indicating a solid but not perfect performance in these aspects, the university clearly excels in providing a comprehensive and highly positive student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 2.33/5, ~67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about the university prioritizing money over quality education and teacher preparedness, though one positive review praised qualified professionals.

The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. Students praise the amazing atmosphere and practical student experience due to the location and facilities. Professors are also noted as attentive and helpful.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close