Université Paris-Sud vs Princeton University vs The University of Auckland vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs University of Waikato
Side-by-side comparison from 168 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging, proactive teaching methods and practical application
- +High-quality, passionate professors and relevant, up-to-date programs
- +Access to advanced technology, opportunities, and international support, with a good location
- +Exceptional professors and personalized learning
- +Abundant and high-quality resources and support
- +Vibrant community and diverse opportunities
- +Passionate and supportive faculty
- +High quality education and learning resources
- +Valuable career guidance and growth opportunities
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Supportive staff and accessible resources
- +Relevant coursework and flexible learning options
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +Hands-on learning and industry professionals
- +Supportive and collaborative student community
- +Diverse and practical course offerings
- +Engaging professors and interactive teaching methods
- +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
- +Inclusive and participatory learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clarity and insufficient student support are common complaints.
- -Outdated curriculum and repetitive content.
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient feedback.
- -Lack of student support and impersonal administration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from staff is frequently unclear or lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum are disappointing.
Overall, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its value proposition, which received a perfect score. Student life and internationality are also notable high points, both scoring 4.33. Facilities, location, and accommodation are consistently rated at a respectable 4. The professors are highly regarded, earning a strong 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, no significant weaknesses are apparent, with all scores falling within a positive range.
This university garners high marks across several key areas. Professors and facilities stand out with particularly strong ratings, indicating excellent teaching quality and campus resources. Student life and accommodation also receive very positive feedback. While location and internationality are rated well, they represent the comparatively weaker, though still good, aspects of the university experience. Value for money is also highly regarded.
This university receives strong endorsements for its Location, with a rating of 4.05, and its Professors, scoring 4.02. Internationality also ranks well at 3.96. Conversely, the areas needing the most attention are Accomodation, rated at 3.63, and Student Life, at 3.66. Facilities and Value fall within a respectable mid-range.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
An evaluation of the university reveals generally positive feedback, with standout scores for Facilities and Professors, both receiving high marks. Location and Internationality also perform well. Student Life emerged as the area with the lowest rating, while Accomodation and Value received solid scores, indicating a generally favorable university experience.
Overall, this institution receives strong marks, particularly for its **value**, which is the highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Professors** also score very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, where ratings are noticeably lower compared to other categories. Other factors like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are all rated positively and consistently.
This university garners strong marks in most areas, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both rated at an impressive 4.53. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also receive commendations, all scoring above 4.2. The standout weakest area is **Location**, with a rating of 3.56. Overall, the institution demonstrates a high level of satisfaction among students in academic and campus life aspects.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with ~83% of 12 reviews being highly rated. Students highlight excellent professors, engaging teaching methods, and good opportunities. There is very little negative feedback to report.
With a perfect 4.5/5 average rating from 44 reviews and no negative feedback, students praise Princeton's academic excellence, approachable professors, and supportive community. The beautiful campus, extensive resources, and research/activity opportunities are frequently highlighted.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers, supportive faculty, and high-quality learning environments. A small percentage of negative feedback notes repetitive course content and limited instructor feedback.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.42/5, students praise supportive staff, relevant coursework, and flexible learning options. The campus environment and social opportunities are also frequently highlighted.
Students highly praise the university, noting a supportive atmosphere, hands-on learning, and diverse program offerings. Friendly student interactions and helpful staff are frequently mentioned. No negative feedback was reported.
All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise engaging classes, passionate professors, and effective teaching methods. There is no negative feedback.
Paris Sud 11 is an overall good university , taking into account its educational programs , professors and adminstative staff , im currently enrolled as a PhD student and as any other PhD program certain credits are required these can be taken from confirences or courses however all of the courses are in french and there is no solo french course for credits some english courses do exist however they are not in proximity to orsay campus , never the less spanish courses are available...
Nothing to show
I found that the overall university experience was not really worth my time and money. Respected professors were only actually lecturing for 1-2 weeks per course, with PhD graduates teaching the majority of the course. Sometimes these PhD graduates weren't able to speak fluent English, which made the learning and teaching actually going on very questionable. In addition to this, you would submit a 3000 word essay, and receive a 15-20 words of feedback. I am certain that very little learning, improvement and education can occur when the feedback loop is so minimal, often generic. In addition to this, many of the "lab" or "tutorial" components were actually university students completing post-graduate experiments as part of their thesis studies. For example, in my psych201 tutorial, we had to spend 2 hours looking at a screen only pressing the "X" or "Z" key a total of 1200 times, and if we did not attend this lecture, we would lose 2% of our total grade. Overall, I question how much education and learning goes on, specifically in the Commerce and Science Faculties. I found my high school classes to go into more depth, with the teachers actually providing many one-on-one conversations to ensure learning is taking place, and this is the learnings that allowed me to pass my first 3 years of papers before any new content was covered, after which, the lectures would have half the class walk out because they couldn't speak fluent english, with students opting to self-teach themselves. If you are requiring students to partake in a study, they must be reimbursed for their time, especially if no learning is taking place. If you are charging students $1000 per course, then the university can afford to pay for staff to assess all of the PHD candidates fluency in English, before they are allowed to teach. In addition, no learning can take place when a question is asked in a foreign language, and the tutor/lecturer replies in a foreign language.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
