Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest

Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE (4.30)
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 4/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 2/7 categories
Spiru Haret University: wins 1/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Titu Maiorescu University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Bucharest, Romania
4.00
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Bucharest, Romania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.98
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.62
Win
3.82
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.89
4.15
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.80
4.33
Win
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.39
Win
3.97
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
Win
3.98
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.08
Win
3.82
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
  • +Accessible and flexible for working students
  • +Competent and available teachers
  • +Modern facilities and engaging courses

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
45%
50%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
37%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Affordable location

Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close