Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs The Entrepreneurship Academy vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest

Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 1/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 1/7 categories
The Entrepreneurship Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Location
4.62
Win
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Professors
3.89
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Internationality
3.80
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Student life
4.39
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Value
4.05
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Accommodation
4.08
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
  • +Positive overall student experience
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
4★
37%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
2★
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close