Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs National University of Political Studies and Public Administration - SNSPA vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest

Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Political Studies and Public Administration - SNSPA (4.80)
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 1/7 categories
National University of Political Studies and Public Administration - SNSPA: wins 5/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 1/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Universitatea Bioterra București: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
4.65
Win
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.62
Win
4.18
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.89
4.63
Win
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.80
4.13
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.39
4.73
Win
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.48
Win
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.08
4.18
Win
3.82
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Practical, real-world relevance of studies
  • +Dedicated, gifted lecturers and useful events
  • +Collaborative atmosphere and personal development
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited course availability and inflexible schedules frustrate students.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

Student feedback indicates excellent student life, boasting a top score of 4.725. Facilities also received strong marks at 4.65. Conversely, internationality was the lowest rated aspect, scoring 4.125. Location and accommodation were also areas with slightly lower scores, both at 4.175. Professors and value were rated highly, with scores of 4.625 and 4.475 respectively.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

Students consistently praise the university's relevance to social reality and development of teamwork skills. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
45%
75%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
37%
25%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Great opportunities at a great uni!

S.N.S.P.A. is a university with students who have a huge potential and an ambition to change the world. The fields you can study here are very connected with the social reality nowadays and they give you a glimpse of what you can change for the better. I recommend it, because teachers here are very gifted and dedicated and they organize for us a lot of events, conferences, competitions, workshops which are very useful.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close