University of Bucharest - UB vs The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti vs Romanian-American University vs The Entrepreneurship Academy vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS
Side-by-side comparison from 147 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced professors and enriching learning experiences.
- +Opportunities for friendship and strong community.
- +Supportive academic environment.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of professor engagement and excessive academic scheduling.
- -Inadequate and delayed scholarship disbursements.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university scores exceptionally well in **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student life** and **value** also stand out with ratings of approximately 4.07. Conversely, **accommodation** received the lowest score at 3.25, indicating it as the weakest area. **Facilities** and **internationality** are rated moderately, while **professors** are highly regarded.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.27 average rating from 44 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight experienced professors, enriched learning, and strong friendships. A small ~2.3% of reviews expressed concerns about professor engagement and scheduling.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show