Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
- +High-quality professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and career support
- +Excellent support and resources
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Practical experience and industry connections
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Excellent professors with extensive experience and international perspective
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects and practical application
- +High-quality education and continuous improvements in facilities
- +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
- +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
- +Positive and well-structured learning environment
- +Excellent professors and well-equipped facilities
- +Active, student-friendly campus environment
- +Convenient location
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program length.
- -Unattractive and inconvenient building facilities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
- -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.
Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
Academic aspects and campus positioning are clear strengths for this institution. Professors received a strong rating of 3.92, while location scored an impressive 4.08. Student life and value also demonstrated solid performance at 3.6 and 3.85 respectively. However, areas such as internationality (2.92) and facilities (3.33) are noted as comparatively weaker points, suggesting room for improvement.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.
The university excels in several key areas, boasting top scores for its location and strong marks for professors and value. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities are rated moderately.
Nothing to show
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
Most reviews (approximately 74%) praise the quality education, experienced professors, and good job prospects. A small portion (about 13%) mentions outdated curricula and management issues.
Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.
All 3 reviews are positive, contributing to a 4.67/5 average rating. Recurring themes include excellent professors and a well-equipped, student-friendly campus environment. Parking was a minor issue for one student.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
